Kid's House Learning Academy

The Primary Caregiver did not have the 30 hours of annual trainings.

The operation was over capacity. The permit is for 12, and the operation was over by 1 child.

There was a caregiver that did not have the required training hours.

There were 2 files that did not have a Health Care Statement filled out.

There were two plastic children's items blocking the exit way. Note: corrected at inspection.

There was Lysol spray and wipes in the vicinity of children in care. Note:corrected at inspection.

The home did not have a menu available for review.

The OP did not conduct fire drills for November.

During the follow-up inspection, upon arrival, 1 caregiver was responsible for 13 children. 6 children were under 4 years old and 7 children were over 4 years old. The home exceeded the ratio by 1

Recited on 02/02/2022 - Based upon the citations observed during the inspection, three of the five conditions established for the probation that became effective 06/25/2021 were not met based upon the citation observed during the inspection. For condition #2, all children present during the inspection were not signed in; #3 the sign in/out log for the caregiver present during the inspection did not indicate the number of children that were in care when they arrived; and condition #4 children were in care for an emergency purpose, resulting in not only a capacity violations but a ratio violation.

There were a total of 13 children in care during the inspection. The home exeeded the total capacity by 1.

Upon arrival, there were a total of 13 children in care with 1 caregiver upon arriving at the home. There were 4 children between the ages of 18 mos-3 years old and 9 children over 4 years old. The home was over ratio by 1 child.

Based upon the citations observed during the inspection, three of the five conditions established for the probation that became effective 06/25/2021 were not met based upon the citation observed during the inspection. For condition #2, all children present during the inspection were not signed in; #3 the sign in/out log for the caregiver present during the inspection did not indicate the number of children that were in care when they arrived; and condition #4 children were in care for an emergency purpose, resulting in not only a capacity violations but a ratio violation.

There were a total of 13 children in care during the inspection. Prior to entering the home, one chilid left and another child (schooler) arrived bring the total back to 13. The home exeeded the total capacity by 1.

Verification was not available for review during the inspection supporting parents were notified in writing the primary caregiver purchased a dog that will be present during the hours of operation.

The provider exceeded the total capacity of children that could be in care by 1. There were a total of 13 children in care and the total capacity is 12.

The provider failed to adhere to two (2) conditions placed on their operation during the corrective action period: (1) The probation notice was not posted in a prominent place near all public entrances of the operation as required; and (2) Documentation was not available for review during the inspection to support a meeting was held with staff informing them the operation was on probation and if they had suggestions on how to prevent the deficiencies.

Upon arrival, there were a total of 13 children in care with 1 caregiver upon arriving at the facility. 2 children were under 17 months old, 6 children were under 4 years old and 5 children were over 5 years old.

RECITED - A file for the primary caregiver's daughter who is under 13 years old was not available during the follow-up inspection.

It was determined the caregiver in charge of a group of children did not demonstrate Competency by not being aware a two year old child was in care and inside of the closet in the back bedroom. The caregiver stated the child the primary caregiver's relative and she didn't realize the child was present.

On the day of the inspection, the home was over ratio and capacity. The home has three bedrooms, one of the doors was locked and licensing was not able to inspect the room to ensure additional children were not in care.

Based upon the deficiencies cited during the follow-up inspection along with the weights of each standard cited, it was determined the permit holder does not operate in compliance with the minimum standards. On the day of the inspection, the home was over capacity, over ratio, a child was hiding in the back closet, and a bedroom door was locked inaccessible for licensing to inspect.

Recited - There were a total of 14 children in care with 1 caregiver upon arriving at the facility. One child was under 17 months old; 8 children were between the ages of 18 mos-3 years old; and fie children were 4 years old and older.

A file for the primary caregiver's daughter who is under 13 years old was not available for review upon request.

During the follow-up inspection, the provider exceeded the total capacity of children that could be in care by 2. There were a total of 14 children in care and the total capacity is 12.

A 14 year old was identified as someone who was helping out.

There were a total of 12 children in care with 1 qualified caregiver. Note: Four children were under 17 months, four were 3 and under, and four were over 4 years old. The ratio exceeded by 6.